Ships particulars
(main items of a standard type under study)
Length LOA 306.0 meters Lightship Displacement 87,900 mt
Beam 50.0 meters Gas Cargo Weight 19,600 mt
Hull Depth 27.4 meters Deadweight 40,600 mt
Full Load Draft 10.3 meters Service Speed 18 knots
    Crew 36 person
 
On the basis of the above particulars, explanations are being given as follows:
 
a. She is expected to be a little smaller as compared with Kumanogawa, a VLCC built at Sakaide Dockyard of Kawasaki Shipbuilding Corporation: LOA 333 meters, Beam 60 meters and Draft 19.2 meters. In the meantime, comparing with Golden Gate Bridge, an Over Panamax-sized containership, the CNG carrier is somewhat larger with a view to LOA 284.7 meters, Beam 40 meters and Draft 12.5 meters.
b. You will find her characteristics when you compare her *lightship displacement, 87,900 mt with 42,038 mt of Kumanogawa and 24,824 mt of Golden Gate Bridge. How different it is from the other two! That difference is attributed to her heavy tanks where CNG is stowed.
 
*Lightship displacement means her displacement when there are no crew, cargo, bunker oil nor water, etc. onboard. It is equivalent to her tare weight itself.
 
Diagram No.1 General Arrangement
 
Structure of tanks
Diagrams 2 and 3 illustrate a tank module named "Pipe Tank Module" into which CNG is poured for sea transportation.
One module combine 24 pipes with each pipe being about 1 meter in diameter and 36 meters in length. She is equipped with 100 sets of modules. She is loaded with 2,400 gigantic pipes. Consequently, her lightship displacement becomes much bigger than any other kind of ship. In a sense, we may as well call her "A Carrier of Pipes."
Further to explain, CNG is loaded into the pipes compressed at about 130 barometric pressures and carried at a low temperature. As compared with the compression ratio of one six hundredth (1/600) of LNG (liquefied natural gas), it is the case that the CNG’s ratio stands lower. However, arrangements are made to heighten the CNG’s compression to one three hundredth (1/300) in volume by compressing and keeping CNG at a low temperature.
 
Diagram No. 2 Pipe Tank Module Diagram No. 3 Pipe Tank Module ( plan view )
 
Equipment for cargo operations
Let’s see how CNG is put into the pipes.
In the case of carriers of LNG and LPG (liquefied petroleum gas), manifolds are usually situated at the center of the hull, which connects pipes from ashore for loading/discharging operations. As you can see from Diagrams 4 and 5, the CNG carrier performs loading/discharging operations, mooring her bottom of the bow with a buoy where a gas transferring pipe named Submerged Turret Nozzle (STL) is installed.
Her method is better because loading/discharging operations are operable with safety even in the case of atmospheric and sea weather conditions being a little bad; it is proved that the system has already been used for the operations of oil tankers in the North Sea.
 
Diagram No. 4
Loading/Discharging Operations & STL
Diagram No. 5
Submerged Turret Nozzle(STL)
 
Propulsion System
The CNG carrier’s speed is expected to be 18 knots per hour. In usual cases, propulsion system rotates propeller through direct connection of a 2-cycle diesel engine with a propeller shaft. In her case, we are examining deployment of an electric propulsion system. It is the first time for us to try this.
More exactly, we are planning to install a gigantic motor instead of diesel engine and rotate propellers through connecting a motor shaft with a propeller shaft. Power for rotating the propellers is supplied from a generator.
 
The merits of the new propelling system are:
a. It will make possible to widen an engine room and give more flexibility for arrangements therein, i.e. securing a wider tank space, etc.
b. It will be possible to set a number of rotations more minutely.
c. In the case of the propelling system with a diesel engine, power is more consumed when cargo operations are on: an extra burden bears on power supply. In the meantime, in the case of the system with motors, no power is used for propelling at berth and an additional power supply will be possible for cargo operations.
 
In the meantime, the demerits are:
a. Required capacity of generating power becomes larger: there is a need for either increase in output of power per generator and engines or an increase in number of generators and engines installed onboard.
b. There is a need for new maintenance plans by introducing the new system.
c. In the case of the propelling system with a diesel engine, power is more consumed when cargo operations are on: an extra burden bears on power supply. In the meantime, in the case of the system with motors, no power is used for propelling at berth and an additional power supply will be possible for cargo operations.
 
We have to manage to make this project successful with new ideas and wisdom.
Finally, the project is being promoted in cooperation with American Bureau of Shipping (ABS). Last April, EnerSea acquired "Approval in Principle" from ABS that assures us safety and achievability of the entire design.
Your kind understanding and support of this project is highly appreciated.


[back]